Cheap Apartments For Rent In Polk County, Fl, Articles S

The language is as clear as one could expect. At FindLaw.com, we pride ourselves on being the number one source of free legal information and resources on the web. 185. In a decisive win for the Fourth Amendment, the U.S. Supreme Court on Wednesday refused "to print a new permission slip for entering the home without a warrant.". Elated gun rights advocates say the Supreme Court's decision in New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. Bruen has opened the door to overturning many other state gun restrictions. A traveler on foot has the same right to use of the public highway as an automobile or any other vehicle. We use Mailchimp as our marketing platform. Those who have the right to do something cannot be licensed for what they already have right to do as such license would be meaningless., City of Chicago v Collins 51 NE 907, 910. Co., vs. Chaput, 60 A.2d 118, 120; 95 NH 200 Motor Vehicle: 18 USC Part 1 Chapter 2 section 31 definitions:", (6) Motor vehicle. The We Are Change site, which posted the original claim, says it is a "nonpartisan, independent media organization comprised of individuals and groups working to expose corruption worldwide.". Chicago Motor Coach vs. Chicago, 169 NE 22; Ligare vs. Chicago, 28 NE 934; Boon vs. Clark, 214 SSW 607; 25 Am.Jur. Those who have the right to do something cannot be licensed for what they already have right to do as such license would be meaningless. City of Chicago v Collins 51 NE 907, 910. Swift v City of Topeka, 43 U.S. Supreme Court says No License Necessary To Drive Automobile On Public Highways/Streets No License Is Necessary Copy and Share Freely YHVH.name 4 Kansas 671, 674. Talk to a lawyer and come back to reality. All rights reserved. Anyone who thinks that driving uninsured and unlicensed is just trying toake a unreasonable argument but I promise if they had someone hit them and harm their child or leave them disabled their opinion would be much different. No matter which state you live in, you are required by law to have a valid driver's license and all endorsements needed for the type of vehicle you are operating, e.g., motorcycle endorsements, commercial vehicle endorsements, etc. Learn more about FindLaws newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy. 1, the 'For The People Act', which aims to counter restrictive state voting . Both have the right to use the easement. Indiana Springs Co. v. Brown, 165 Ind. ments on each side. Answer (1 of 4): I went to Supreme Court of the United States and searched for the topic of 'drivers license,' and receive this result: Supreme Court of the United States So, it does appear some people have sued over losing their State drivers' license, and taken their case all the way to the U.. A driver's license is only legally required when doing commerce. You "mah raights" crowd are full of conspiracy theories. The decision comes as President Joe. at page 187. 1907). LinkedIn and 3rd parties use essential and non-essential cookies to provide, secure, analyze and improve our Services, and to show you relevant ads (including professional and job ads) on and off LinkedIn. Indeed. The Southern Poverty Law Center has dubbed the group a ", https://leadstories.com/hoax-alert/2020/01/fake-news-U.S.-Supreme-Court-Did-NOT-Rule-No-Licence-Necessary-To-Drive-Automobile-on-Public-Roads.html, Fake News: World Health Organization Did NOT Officially Declare Coronavirus A Plague; 950,680 Are NOT Dead, Fake News: NO Evidence Coronavirus Is A Man-made Depopulation Weapon, "Restore Liability For the Vaccine Makers", Snopes cited the fuller context of the ruling, conspiracy-obsessed 'Patriot' organization, Verified signatory of the IFCN Code of Principles, Facebook Third-Party Fact-Checking Partner. automobiles are lawful vehicles and have equal rights on the highways with horses and carriages. Kent v. Dulles, the 5th amendment, the 10th amendment, and due process. Escobedo v. State 35 C2d 870 in 8 Cal Jur 3d p.27 RIGHT -- A legal RIGHT, a constitutional RIGHT means a RIGHT protected by the law, by the constitution, but government does not create the idea of RIGHT or original RIGHTS; it acknowledges them. Because in most states YOU would've paid out that $2 million and counting. The fact-checking site Snopes knocked the alleged ruling down, back in 2015, shortly after it began circulating. WASHINGTON (CN) The Supreme Court on Monday held it does not violate the Fourth Amendment for a police officer to pull over a car because it is registered to a person with a revoked license, so long as the officer does not have reason to believe someone other than the owner is driving the car. David Mikkelson founded the site now known as snopes.com back in 1994. Matson v. Dawson, 178 N.W. In Thompson v Smith - SCOTUS Supreme Court on Wednesday put limits on when police officers pursuing a fleeing suspect can enter a home without a warrant. A traveler has an equal right to employ an automobile as a means of transportation and to occupy the public highways with other vehicles in common use. Campbell v. Walker, 78 Atl. In other words, the court held that although the use of public roads is a right which citizens enjoy, local authorities may nonetheless regulate such use (including imposing a requirement that motor vehicle operators obtain licenses) so long as such regulations are reasonable, not arbitrary, and apply equally to everyone. QPReport. there are zero collective rights rights belong to the human, not the group. automobiles are lawful vehicles and have equal rights on the highways with horses and carriages. 351, 354. Cecchi v. Lindsay, 75 Atl. It includes the right, in so doing, to use the ordinary and usual conveyances of the day, and under the existing modes of travel, includes the right to drive a horse drawn carriage or wagon thereon or to operate an automobile thereon, for the usual and ordinary purpose of life and business. , Thompson vs. Smith, supra. A license is the LAW. 241, 246; Molway v. City of Chicago, 88 N.E. It is sometimes said that in America we have the "right to our opinion". Driving without a valid license can result in significant charges. The Economic Club of Southwestern Michigan, Benton Harbor, MI, September 23 . We never question anything or do anything about much. Who is a member of the public? This site might have references but I read all of the stuff I said to in the beginning nowhere did it say driving is a right! In fact, during the 2019, 2020, 2021, and 2022 events combined, Clerks of Court held more than 200 events and helped more than 35,000 . endstream endobj startxref FEARS, 179 U.S. 270, AT 274 CRANDALL VS. NEVADA, 6 WALL. Christian my butt. ), 8 F.3d 226, 235 19A Words and Phrases Permanent Edition (West) pocket part 94. I said what I said. The right to travel (called the right of free ingress to other states, and egress from them) is so fundamental that it appears in the Articles of Confederation, which governed our society before the Constitution.. 10th Amendment gives the states the right and the obligation to maintain good public order. 35, AT 43-44 - THE PASSENGER CASES, 7 HOWARD 287, AT 492 - U.S. I'm lucky Michigan has no fault and so are your! "We hold that when the officer lacks information negating an inference that the owner is the . Other right to use an automobile cases: , TWINING VS NEW JERSEY, 211 U.S. 78 WILLIAMS VS. Stop stirring trouble. With that I shall begin with my opinion and some history about Saint Ignatius of Loyola. 762, 764, 41 Ind. You will also find that all the authors are deeply concerned about the future of America. Look up vehicle verses automobile. After doing a search for several days I came across the most stable advise one could give. It is improper to say that the driver of the horse has rights in the roads superior to the driver of the automobile. The right to operate a motor vehicle [an automobile] upon the public streets and highways is not a mere privilege. We have all been fooled. He Hillhouse v United States, 152 F. 163, 164 (2nd Cir. 351, 354. It is improper to say that the driver of the horse has rights in the roads superior to the driver of the automobile. - Ex Parte Dickey, (Dickey vs. Davis), 85 SE 781 Every Citizen has an unalienable RIGHT to make use of the public highways of the state; every Citizen has full freedom to travel from place to place in the enjoyment of life and liberty. People v. Nothaus, 147 Colo. 210. For information about our privacy practices, please visit our website. A license means leave to do a thing which the licensor could prevent. Blatz Brewing Co. v. Collins, 160 P.2d 37, 39; 69 Cal. 562, 566-67 (1979), citizens have a right to drive upon the public streets of the District of Columbia or any other city absent a constitutionally sound reason for limiting their access. Caneisha Mills v. D.C. 2009. Just because there is a "law" in tact does not mean it's right. Doherty v. Ayer, 83 N.E. People v. Battle "Persons faced with an unconstitutional licensing law which purports to require a license as a prerequisite to exercise of right may ignore the law and engage with impunity in exercise of such right." There are two (2) separate and distinct rationales underlying this U.S. Supreme Court says No License Necessary To Drive Automobile On Public Highways/Streets No License Is Necessary Copy and Share Freely YHVH.name 2 2 "A highway is a public way open and free to any one who has occasion to pass along it on foot or with any kind of vehicle." Schlesinger v. City of Atlanta, 129 S.E. Period. If you talk to a real lawyer (and not Sidney Powell or Rudy Giuliani) maybe your lack of critical thinking would be better. 233, 237, 62 Fla. 166. However, like most culturally important writings, the Constitution is interpreted differently by different people. . Some people interpret this right as meaning that they do not need a driver's license to operate a vehicle on public roadways, but do state and federal laws agree with that interpretation? This material may not be reproduced without permission. If you want to verify that the supreme court has made a ruling about something, go to supremecourt.gov and search for it. The. See who is sharing it (it might even be your friends) and leave the link in the comments. 157, 158. It only means you can drive on YOUR property without a license. Another bit of context elided from the example article is the fact that in when the referenced decision was handed down by the Supreme Court of Virginia in 1930, several of the 48 states did not yet require motorists to possess driver's licenses to operate motor vehicles on public roads. The regulation of the exercise of the right to drive a private automobile on the streets of the city may be accomplished in part by the city by granting, refusing, and revoking, under rules of general application, permits to drive an automobile on its streets; but such permits may not be arbitrarily refused or revoked, or permitted to be held by some and refused to other of like qualifications, under like circumstances and conditions. T he U.S. Supreme Court unanimously ruled on Monday that an exception to the Fourth Amendment for "community caretaking" does not allow police to enter and search a home without a warrant.. This is why this country is in the state we're in. ], U.S. v Bomar, C.A.5(Tex. 41. The owners thereof have the same rights in the roads and streets as the drivers of horses or those riding a bicycle or traveling in some other vehicle. House v. Cramer, 112 N.W. If rules are broken or laws are violated, the State reserves the right to restrict or revoke a persons privilege. Statutes at Large California Chapter 412 p.83 "Highways are for the use of the traveling public, and all have the right to use them in a reasonable and proper manner; the use thereof is an inalienable right of every citizen." Hendrick v. Maryland235 US 610 (1915) It is not a mere privilege, like the privilege of moving a house in the street, operating a business stand in the street, or transporting persons or property for hire along the street, which a city may permit or prohibit at will. A seat belt ticket is because of the LAW. Kim LaCapria is a former writer for Snopes. . Co., 100 N.E. Moreover, fewer than one in five Americans owned a car in the 1930s (a demographic that saw little upswing until after the end of World War II). 959 0 obj <>/Filter/FlateDecode/ID[<4FCC9F776CAF774D860417589F9B0987>]/Index[942 26]/Info 941 0 R/Length 84/Prev 164654/Root 943 0 R/Size 968/Type/XRef/W[1 2 1]>>stream There is no supreme court ruling confirming or denying a "right to drive" Without this requirement, the state puts themselves in legal jeopardy because the constituents can sue the state for not sufficiently vetting persons operating vehicles to make sure they were aware that the person who just killed 20 people was not capable of operating said vehicle safely. | Last updated November 08, 2019. It is a right of liberty, the enjoyment of which is protected by the guarantees of the federal and state constitutions., Adams v. City of Pocatello, 416 P.2d 46, 48; 91 Idaho 99 (1966). It came from an attorney who litigates criminal traffic offenses, which driving without a license is a misdemeanor of the 2nd degree in most states. I don't know why so many are still so blind and ignorant and believe law makers government and others give a real shit about any of us yet we follow them and their rules without question. Some citations may be paraphrased. H|KO@=K Barb Lind, you make these statements about laws being laws, and that it only means that you can drive on your own property without a license. Contact us. You THINK you can read the law and are so ill informed. Our nation has thrived on the principle that, outside areas of plainly harmful conduct, every American is left to shape his own life as he thinks best, do what he pleases, go where he pleases. Id., at 197. VS. (1st) Highways Sect.163 the right of the Citizen to travel upon the highway and to transport his property thereon in the ordinary course of life and business is the usual and ordinary right of the Citizen, a right common to all. , Ex Parte Dickey, (Dickey vs. Davis), 85 SE 781 Every Citizen has an unalienable RIGHT to make use of the public highways of the state; every Citizen has full freedom to travel from place to place in the enjoyment of life and liberty. People v. Nothaus, 147 Colo. 210. 942 0 obj <> endobj That does not mean in a social compact you get to disregard them. U.S. Supreme Court says No License Necessary To Drive Automobile On Public Highways/Streets No License Is Necessary Copy and Share Freely YHVH.name 2 2 "A highway is a public way open and free to any one who has occasion to pass along it on foot or with any kind of vehicle." Schlesinger v. City of Atlanta, 129 S.E. The Supreme Court NEVER said that. Bottom line - REAL, flesh and blood humans have a right to travel WITHOUT permission or a license. No. Generally . Try again. -International Motor Transit Co. vs. Seattle, 251 P. 120, The term motor vehicle is different and broader than the word automobile." -City of Dayton vs. DeBrosse, 23 NE.2d 647, 650; 62 Ohio App. They have an equal right with other vehicles in common use to occupy the streets and roads. The Supreme Court agreed to hear a major Second Amendment dispute that could settle whether the Constitution protects a right to carry guns in public. The owner of an automobile has the same right as the owner of other vehicles to use the highway,* * * A traveler on foot has the same right to the use of the public highways as an automobile or any other vehicle., Simeone v. Lindsay, 65 Atl. Persons may lawfully ride in automobiles, as they may lawfully ride on bicycles. 69, 110 Minn. 454, 456, "The word automobile connotes a pleasure vehicle designed for the transportation of persons on highways." Under this constitutional guaranty one may, therefore, under normal conditions, travel at his inclination along the public highways or in public places, and while conducting himself in an orderly and decent manner, neither interfering with nor disturbing another's rights, he will be protected, not only in his person, but in his safe conduct." The foreign corporation we call government uses transliteration and bastardization of the Amercian/English language to manipulate and control their serfs, slaves, subjects and servants called United States Citizens, Incorporated. (1st) Highways Sect.163 "the right of the Citizen to travel upon the highway and to transport his property thereon in the ordinary course of life and business is the usual and ordinary right of the Citizen, a right common to all." "A soldier's personal automobile is part of his household goods[. 2d 298, 304, 220 Ga. 104; Stavola v. Palmer, 73 A.2d 831, 838, 136 Conn. 670 There can be no question of the right of automobile owners to occupy and use the public streets of cities, or highways in the rural districts. Liebrecht v. Crandall, 126 N.W. Delete my comment. 20-979 Patel v. Garland (05/16/2022) had previously checked a box on a Georgia driver's license application falsely stating that he was a United States. While the right of travel is a fundamental right, the privilege to operate a motor vehicle can be conditionally granted based upon being licensed and following certain rules. The US Supreme Court on April 29, 2021 in Washington, DC. It's one thing to tax us for the roads. ], United States v Johnson, 718 F.2d 1317, 1324 (5th Cir. Lead Stories is a U.S. based fact checking website that is always looking for the latest false, misleading, deceptive or (Paul v. Virginia). Firms, Sample Letter re Trial Date for Traffic Citation. However, a full reading of the referenced case, Thompson v. Smith, 155 Va. 367 Va: Supreme Court 1930 (available via Google Scholar) presents that inaugural quote in an entirely different context: The right of a citizen to travel upon the public highways and to transport his property thereon in the ordinary course of life and business is a common right which he has under his right to enjoy life and liberty, to acquire and possess property, and to pursue happiness and safety. If [state] officials construe a vague statute unconstitutionally, the citizen may take them at their word, and act on the assumption that the statute is void. - Shuttlesworth v. Birmingham 394 U.S. 147 (1969). I suggest those interested look up the definition of "Person" or "Individual". In respect to license and insurance I have to actually agree it should be required. Under this constitutional guaranty one may, therefore, under normal conditions, travel at his inclination along the public highways or in public places, and while conducting himself in an orderly and decent manner, neither interfering with nor disturbing another's rights, he will be protected, not only in his person, but in his safe conduct.". United States v Johnson, 718 F.2d 1317, 1324 (5th Cir. Both have the right to use the easement.. 778, 779; Hannigan v. Wright, 63 Atl. 861, 867, 161 Ga. 148, 159; Everyday normal citizens can legally travel without a license to get from point a to point b. Please prove this wrong if you think it is, with cites from cases as the author has done below. The email address cannot be subscribed. 762, 764, 41 Ind. Copyright 2023, Thomson Reuters. I wonder when people will have had enough. Part of those go to infrastructure to keep the roads safe and maintained along with a ton of other programs. I do invite everyone to comment as they see fit, but follow a few simple rules. Our goal is to create a community of truth-seekers and peacemakers who share a commitment to nonviolent action," the site says. 485, 486, 239 Ill. 486; Smiley v. East St. Louis Ry. It has NOTHING to do with your crazy Sovereign Citizen BS. The Supreme Court on Thursday narrowed the scope of a federal cybercrime law, holding that a policeman who improperly accessed a license plate database could not be charged under the law.. Posted byPaul Stramerat11:31 PM52 comments:Email This, Labels:Anna von Reitz,Catholic Faith,Paul Stramer. House v. Cramer, 112 N.W. If you want to do anything legal for a job, you need the states the right to travel does not pertain to driving at all and usually pertains to the freedom of movement of a passenger. App. Therefore, regulatory issues stemming from broader vehicle ownership and more modern vehicle operating conditions were still decades in the future at the time the ruling was issued. wKRDbJ]' QdsE ggoPoqhs=%l2_txx^_OGMCq}u>S^g1?_vAoMVmVC>?U1]\.Jb|,q59OQ)*F5BP"ag8"Hh b!9cao!. If you truly believe this then you obviously have never learned what a scholarly source is. If you have an opinion on a particular article, please comment by clicking the title of the article and scrolling to the box at the bottom on that page. Supreme Court says states may not impose mandatory life sentences on juvenile murderers. EDGERTON, Chief Judge: Iron curtains have no place in a free world. And driving without a license is indeed illegal in all 50 states. The RIGHT of the citizen to DRIVE on the public street with freedom from police interference, unless he is engaged in suspicious conduct associated in some manner with criminality is a FUNDAMENTAL CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT which must be protected by the courts. People v. Horton 14 Cal. 1983). The high . Driver's licenses are issued state by state (with varying requirements), not at. I will be back when I have looked at a few more, https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/supreme-court-rules-drivers-licenses-unnecessary/. 848; ONeil vs. Providence Amusement Co., 108 A. Chicago Coach Co. v. City of Chicago, 337 Ill. 200, 205; See also: Christy v. Elliot, 216 Ill. 31; Ward v. Meredith, 202 Ill. 66; Shinkle v. McCullough, 116 Ky. 960; Butler v. Cabe, 116 Ark. A processional task. Complex traffic tickets usually require a lawyer, Experienced lawyers can seek to reduce or eliminate penalties. 465, 468. Brinkman v Pacholike, 84 N.E. Why do you feel the inclination to lie to people? Some citations may be paraphrased. if someone is using a car, they are traveling. Draffin v. Massey, 92 S.E.2d 38, 42. Words matter. Demonstrators rally near the Supreme Court and the U.S. Capitol in Washington, D.C. on June 24, 2021 in support of H.R. The administrator reserves the right to remove unwarranted personal attacks. Cecchi v. Lindsay, 75 Atl. When you have an answer to that, send them out to alter public property and youll find the government still objects, because what they MEANT was government property, but they didnt want you to notice. "With regard particularly to the U.S. Constitution, it is elementary that a Right secured or protected by that document cannot be overthrown or impaired by any state police authority." Co., vs. Chaput, 60 A.2d 118, 120; 95 NH 200 Motor Vehicle: 18 USC Part 1 Chapter 2 section 31 definitions: (6) Motor vehicle. I wonder when the "enforcers" of tyranny will realize they took an oath to the Constitution before God, and stop their tyranny? In terms of U.S. law, your right to travel does not mean you have a right to drive or to a particular mode of travel, i.e., a motor vehicle, airplane, etc. That decision said life without parole should be reserved for "the rarest of juvenile offenders, those . Spotted something? 2d 639. 233, 237, 62 Fla. 166. To infringe on anyone else's safety is NOT what Jesus intended. The We Are Change site, which posted the original claim, says it is, a "nonpartisan, independent media organization comprised of individuals and groups working to expose corruption worldwide.". FEARS, 179 U.S. 270, AT 274 - CRANDALL VS. NEVADA, 6 WALL. When expanded it provides a list of search options that will switch the search inputs to match the current selection. ; Teche Lines vs. Danforth, Miss., 12 S.2d 784 the right of the citizen to drive on a public street with freedom from police interference is a fundamental constitutional right -White, 97 Cal.App.3d.141, 158 Cal.Rptr. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply. The decision could mean thousands of Uber drivers are entitled to minimum wage and holiday pay . 241, 28 L.Ed. Many traffic ticket attorneys offer free consultations. A farmer has the same right to the use of the highways of the state, whether on foot or in a motor vehicle, as any other citizen. 376, 377, 1 Boyce (Del.) 157, 158. %PDF-1.6 % The right to make use of an automobile as a vehicle of travel long the highways of the state, is no longer an open question. The U.S. Supreme Court's new conservative majority made a U-turn on Thursday, ruling by a 6-3 vote, that a judge need not make a finding of "permanent incorrigibility" before sentencing a. It might be expensive but your argument won't hold up in court and I will win when I track you down because you refuse to take responsibility for your attempted manslaughter which you'll be charged with a homicide once the judge finds out why you don't have what's required of you. This article first appeared on SomeNextLevelShit.com and was authored by Jeffrey Phillips. Williams v. Fears, 179 U.S. 270, 274, 21 S.Ct. The public is a weird fiction. 22. 861, 867, 161 Ga. 148, 159; Holland v. Shackelford, 137 S.E. Glover was in fact driving and was charged with driving as a habitual violator. The owner of an automobile has the same right as the owner of other vehicles to use the highway,* * * A traveler on foot has the same right to the use of the public highways as an automobile or any other vehicle. Simeone v. Lindsay, 65 Atl. Created byFindLaw's team of legal writers and editors The U.S. Supreme Court's recent ruling has made these traffic stops now even more accessible for law enforcement. hVmO0+84#!`tcC(^-Mh(u|Ja$h\,8Gs)AQ+Mxl9:.h,(g.3'nYZ--Il#1F? f URzjx([!I:WUq[U;/ gK/vjH]mtNzt*S_ As I have said many times, this website is here for the express purpose of finding solutions for the big mess we are in here in America, and articles are published from several authors that also have freedom in America as their focus. 256; Hadfield vs. Lundin, 98 Wash 516, Willis vs. Buck, 263 P. l 982; Barney vs. Board of Railroad Commissioners, 17 P.2d 82 The use of the highways for the purpose of travel and transportation is not a mere privilege, but a common and fundamental Right of which the public and the individual cannot be rightfully deprived., Chicago Motor Coach vs. Chicago, 169 NE 22; Ligare vs. Chicago, 28 NE 934; Boon vs. Clark, 214 SSW 607; 25 Am.Jur. The law recognizes such right of use upon general principles. U.S. Supreme Court says No License Necessary To Drive Automobile On Public Highways/Streets No License Is Necessary Copy and Share Freely YHVH.name 3 The word operator shall not include any person who solely transports his own property and who transports no persons or property for hire or compensation., Statutes at Large California Chapter 412 p.83 Highways are for the use of the traveling public, and all have the right to use them in a reasonable and proper manner; the use thereof is an inalienable right of every citizen. Escobedo v. State 35 C2d 870 in 8 Cal Jur 3d p.27 RIGHT A legal RIGHT, a constitutional RIGHT means a RIGHT protected by the law, by the constitution, but government does not create the idea of RIGHT or original RIGHTS; it acknowledges them. If someone is paid to drive someone or something around, they are driving. It's time to stop being so naive and blind and wake up and start making changes that make sense. Let us know!. Sign up on lukeuncensored.com or to check out our store on thebestpoliticalshirts.com. 2d 298, 304, 220 Ga. 104; Stavola v. Palmer, 73 A.2d 831, 838, 136 Conn. 670, There can be no question of the right of automobile owners to occupy and use the public streets of cities, or highways in the rural districts. Liebrecht v. Crandall, 126 N.W. 861, 867, 161 Ga. 148, 159; At issue was not the need to have a license (as was already affirmed) but the the financial responsibility law violated due process. Traffic infractions are not a crime. People v. Battle Persons faced with an unconstitutional licensing law which purports to require a license as a prerequisite to exercise of right may ignore the law and engage with impunity in exercise of such right., Shuttlesworth v. Birmingham 394 U.S. 147 (1969). v. CALIFORNIA . Most people do not have the financial ability and even if they did wouldn't alot money to you because you were hurt. You're actually incorrect, do some searching as I am right now. The object of a license is to confer a right or power, which does not exist without it., Payne v. Massey (19__) 196 SW 2nd 493, 145 Tex 273. Contact a qualified traffic ticket attorney to help you get the best result possible. The owners thereof have the same rights in the roads and streets as the drivers of horses or those riding a bicycle or traveling in some other vehicle.. inaccurate stories, videos or images going viral on the internet. Your arguing and trying to stir more conspiracies and that's the problem. Snopes cited the fuller context of the ruling, which said: The regulation of the exercise of the right to drive a private automobile on the streets of the city may be accomplished in part by the city by granting, refusing, and revoking, under rules of general application, permits to drive an automobile on its streets; but such permits may not be arbitrarily refused or revoked, or permitted to be held by some and refused to other of like qualifications, under like circumstances and conditions.